Teachers have to get fingerprinted. We also have to get a Master's degree, and collect continuing education credits in order to make progress up the pay scale. I have no problem with any of that.
I am concerned about teacher preparation generally in this country, and those concerns can start with my own experience of my Master's Degree program at the New School in New York City about 15 years ago. I am so proud of the work that I have done over the last 14 years, but very little of that has to do (positively) with how I was prepared at the New School, I'm afraid. This paragraph on page 93 of the National Council of Teacher Quality's Teacher Prep Review was particularly biting, and brought back unpleasant memories:
Teacher educators now view their job as forming the professional identities of teachers. They aim to confront and expunge the prejudices of teacher candidates, particularly those related to race, class, language and culture. This improbable feat, not unlike the transformation of Pinocchio from puppet to real boy, is attempted as candidates reveal their feelings and attitudes through abundant in-class dialogue and regular journal writing. Once freed of their errant assumptions, teachers can embark on a lifelong journey of learning, distinct from knowing, as actual knowledge is perceived by teacher educators as too fluid to be achievable and may even harden into bias. The goal is for each candidate to develop his or her own unique philosophy of teaching, no matter how thin the ground is underneath.
It seems so soft: because it was. In a cohort of other master's degree students, we were assigned some inspirational and important readings, many of which have had a real impact on my approach to my work even still. But, the discussions that took place, with little leadership from our professors, were often demoralizing, overly emotional, self-indulgently personal, and distracting from the task at hand. I often worried about how such self-centeredness would impact this or that teacher's ability to teach children. In my memory, several of my fellow grad students in that program had a chip on their shoulder that they wanted credit for, and a few voices dominated our class discussions in some combative, unconstructive ways. I was often thinking, let's get to WORK! For the dubiously meaningful experience of listening to adults compare their often juvenile and self-aggrandizing attitudes about equity and social justice, I'm still paying on my original student loan of more than $20,000.00. Fifteen years later.
The real value of my teacher preparation came from my experience with my student teaching partner and our mentoring teacher, Julie Conason, at East Side Community High School. If my student loan debt could be repaid to her and other faculty members at East Side Community, I'd write those checks more cheerfully.
I learned several years ago that The New School had dropped it's Teacher Preparation program. I'd love to know why (officially).
I've also had the privilege of mentoring some student teachers in the past. I have some ideas about how teacher preparation can be better.
Teaching is not a "calling." Teaching is a profession. It requires effective communication and a serious minded approach to content and presentation and assessment and the management of young people's school days. It is critically important to, as the report suggests, "confront and expunge the prejudices...particularly those related to race, class, language and culture," but it seems to me that that should be a criterion of acceptance into a teacher preparation program -- you can't get in unless you've demonstrated you've done good work on this count -- rather than the whole of the program itself.